Decap CMSvsHalo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Decap CMS | Halo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 13 in Headless CMS | #3 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 456 | 40 076 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +189 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v2.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Halo scores 79/100 against 72/100 for Decap CMS, so it is the safer default.
Halo ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Decap CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Decap CMS is easier to run; Halo needs more configuration.
Halo is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).
Decap CMS details →Halo details →
Swap a project
Keep Decap CMS, compare it with
Keep Halo, compare it with