# ddns-go vs Lucky

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ddns-go | Lucky |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 41 in DNS | #12 of 20 in Network Utilities |
| GitHub stars | 17 486 ✓ | 8 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +123 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v6.17.7 · 4 Sept 2026 ✓ | v2.27.2 · 15 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

ddns-go scores 74/100 against 57/100 for Lucky, so it is the safer default.

ddns-go ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Lucky.

ddns-go is growing faster right now (+123 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ddns-go](https://selfhost.directory/project/ddns-go) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ddns-go.md)
- [Lucky](https://selfhost.directory/project/lucky-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lucky-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ddns-go-vs-lucky-2