# Databasus vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Databasus | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 46 in Backup | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 9 208 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +559 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.64.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Databasus scores 74/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Databasus ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Databasus is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Databasus is growing faster right now (+559 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Databasus](https://selfhost.directory/project/databasus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/databasus.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/databasus-vs-windows-arm