DashBeamvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DashBeam | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 123 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.7.2 · 14 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
DashBeam scores 70/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for DashBeam.
If you want the quickest setup, DashBeam is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
DashBeam is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).
DashBeam details →Windows ARM details →