# DashBeam vs Mularr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DashBeam | Mularr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync | #2 of 2 in P2P |
| GitHub stars | 10 120 ✓ | 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.2 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DashBeam scores 70/100 against 45/100 for Mularr, so it is the safer default.

Mularr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for DashBeam.

DashBeam is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DashBeam](https://selfhost.directory/project/dashbeam) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dashbeam.md)
- [Mularr](https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dashbeam-vs-mularr