DanB/RSSvsRSS-Bridge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DanB/RSS | RSS-Bridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #19 of 86 in Feed Reader | #1 of 4 in RSS |
| GitHub stars | — | 9 343 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +68 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Unlicense |
| Main language | — | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
RSS-Bridge scores 73/100 against 53/100 for DanB/RSS, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, DanB/RSS is easier to run; RSS-Bridge needs more configuration.
RSS-Bridge is growing faster right now (+68 stars in 30 days).
Key differences
- License: DanB/RSS is MIT, RSS-Bridge is Unlicense.
- Platforms only DanB/RSS lists: Build from Source, Docker.
- Platforms only RSS-Bridge lists: Composer, Linux.
- Features only DanB/RSS lists: Automatic Feed Fetching, Built-in Authentication, Custom feed names and colors, Feed management UI and 10 more.
- Features only RSS-Bridge lists: Bridge allow-listing, Custom bridge development, Error reporting in feeds, Feed Filtering and 10 more.
DanB/RSS details →RSS-Bridge details →