# daedalOS vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | daedalOS | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Emulation | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 076 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +39 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 72/100 for daedalOS, so it is the safer default.

daedalOS is growing faster right now (+39 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [daedalOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/daedalos-vs-zookeeper