# daedalOS vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | daedalOS | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Emulation | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 13 077 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +40 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

daedalOS scores 72/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

uncompressed ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for daedalOS.

If you want the quickest setup, daedalOS is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

daedalOS is growing faster right now (+40 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [daedalOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/daedalos-vs-uncompressed