# daedalOS vs Tuleap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | daedalOS | Tuleap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Emulation | #11 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 078 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +39 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

daedalOS scores 72/100 against 64/100 for Tuleap, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, daedalOS is easier to run; Tuleap needs more configuration.

daedalOS is growing faster right now (+39 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [daedalOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos.md)
- [Tuleap](https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tuleap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/daedalos-vs-tuleap