# daedalOS vs Tinystatus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | daedalOS | Tinystatus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Emulation | #37 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 13 077 ✓ | 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +38 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

daedalOS scores 72/100 against 45/100 for Tinystatus, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Tinystatus is easier to run; daedalOS needs more configuration.

daedalOS is growing faster right now (+38 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [daedalOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos.md)
- [Tinystatus](https://selfhost.directory/project/tinystatus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tinystatus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/daedalos-vs-tinystatus