daedalOSvsTinystatus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| daedalOS | Tinystatus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Emulation | #37 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 13 077 | 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +38 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
daedalOS scores 72/100 against 45/100 for Tinystatus, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Tinystatus is easier to run; daedalOS needs more configuration.
daedalOS is growing faster right now (+38 stars in 30 days).
daedalOS details →Tinystatus details →
Swap a project
Keep daedalOS, compare it with
Keep Tinystatus, compare it with