# daedalOS vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | daedalOS | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Emulation | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 13 078 ✓ | 1 376 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +39 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

daedalOS scores 72/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for daedalOS.

daedalOS is growing faster right now (+39 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [daedalOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/daedalos.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/daedalos-vs-tapflow