# d2c.sh vs docker-pi-hole

> Two self-hosted [DNS projects](https://selfhost.directory/dns), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | d2c.sh | docker-pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #31 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 228 | 11 728 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +115 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 41/100 for d2c.sh, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for d2c.sh.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+115 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [d2c.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/d2c-sh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/d2c-sh.md)
- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/d2c-sh-vs-docker-pi-hole