# cups-avahi-airprint vs Tasmota

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cups-avahi-airprint | Tasmota |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 11 in Device Management | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 221 | 24 940 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +168 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Tasmota scores 79/100 against 47/100 for cups-avahi-airprint, so it is the safer default.

Tasmota ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for cups-avahi-airprint.

If you want the quickest setup, cups-avahi-airprint is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.

Tasmota is growing faster right now (+168 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cups-avahi-airprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/cups-avahi-airprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cups-avahi-airprint.md)
- [Tasmota](https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cups-avahi-airprint-vs-tasmota