# cupdate vs Portainer

> Two self-hosted [Container Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/container-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cupdate | Portainer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #25 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 312 | 38 736 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +187 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.25.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Zlib |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Portainer scores 77/100 against 48/100 for cupdate, so it is the safer default.

Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for cupdate.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; cupdate needs more configuration.

Portainer is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cupdate](https://selfhost.directory/project/cupdate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cupdate.md)
- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cupdate-vs-portainer