# CubePlex vs n8n

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CubePlex | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #138 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 574 | 208 889 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 080 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 205 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

n8n scores 92/100 against 45/100 for CubePlex, so it is the safer default.

n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for CubePlex.

If you want the quickest setup, n8n is easier to run; CubePlex needs more configuration.

n8n is growing faster right now (+3 080 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CubePlex](https://selfhost.directory/project/cubeplex) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cubeplex.md)
- [n8n](https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cubeplex-vs-n8n