# cState vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cState | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 901 | 6 050 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +98 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7-r1 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | HTML | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 62/100 for cState, so it is the safer default.

cState ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, cState is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cState](https://selfhost.directory/project/cstate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cstate.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cstate-vs-zammad