# cState vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cState | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 2 901 | 4 338 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +46 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7-r1 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | HTML | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

WhisperLive---CPU scores 64/100 against 62/100 for cState, so it is the safer default.

WhisperLive---CPU ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for cState.

If you want the quickest setup, cState is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.

WhisperLive---CPU is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cState](https://selfhost.directory/project/cstate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cstate.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cstate-vs-whisperlive-cpu