# CryptPad vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CryptPad | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Office Suites | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 8 031 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +79 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

CryptPad scores 71/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for CryptPad.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; CryptPad needs more configuration.

CryptPad is growing faster right now (+79 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CryptPad](https://selfhost.directory/project/cryptpad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cryptpad.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cryptpad-vs-uusec-waf