# CryptPad vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CryptPad | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Office Suites | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 8 031 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

CryptPad scores 71/100 against 65/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for CryptPad.

If you want the quickest setup, uMap is easier to run; CryptPad needs more configuration.

CryptPad is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CryptPad](https://selfhost.directory/project/cryptpad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cryptpad.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cryptpad-vs-umap