# CryptPad vs tobab

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CryptPad | tobab |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Office Suites | #34 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 8 031 ✓ | 155 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

CryptPad scores 71/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

CryptPad ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

If you want the quickest setup, tobab is easier to run; CryptPad needs more configuration.

CryptPad is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CryptPad](https://selfhost.directory/project/cryptpad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cryptpad.md)
- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cryptpad-vs-tobab