# CryptPad vs OpenELIS Global

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CryptPad | OpenELIS Global |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Office Suites | #3 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 8 031 ✓ | 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

CryptPad scores 71/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.

OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for CryptPad.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenELIS Global is easier to run; CryptPad needs more configuration.

CryptPad is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CryptPad](https://selfhost.directory/project/cryptpad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cryptpad.md)
- [OpenELIS Global](https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cryptpad-vs-openelis-global-2