crowdsecvsweb-check
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| crowdsec | web-check | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #1 of 3 in OSINT |
| GitHub stars | 15 357 | 35 279 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +410 | +372 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
web-check scores 81/100 against 76/100 for crowdsec, so it is the safer default.
crowdsec ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for web-check.
If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; crowdsec needs more configuration.
crowdsec details →web-check details →
Swap a project
Keep crowdsec, compare it with
Keep web-check, compare it with