# crowdsec vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | crowdsec | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 15 358 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +411 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

crowdsec scores 76/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

crowdsec ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, crowdsec is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

crowdsec is growing faster right now (+411 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [crowdsec](https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/crowdsec-vs-urbit