# crowdsec vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | crowdsec | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 15 358 | 93 035 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +411 | +1 288 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 76/100 for crowdsec, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for crowdsec.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; crowdsec needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [crowdsec](https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/crowdsec-vs-uptime-kuma