# crowdsec vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | crowdsec | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 360 | 95 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +413 | +2 347 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 76/100 for crowdsec, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for crowdsec.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [crowdsec](https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/crowdsec-vs-stirling-pdf