# crowdsec vs Shinobi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | crowdsec | Shinobi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 15 358 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +411 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | — |

## Which one should you pick?

crowdsec scores 76/100 against 66/100 for Shinobi, so it is the safer default.

crowdsec ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, crowdsec is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

crowdsec is growing faster right now (+411 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [crowdsec](https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec.md)
- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/crowdsec-vs-shinobi