crowdsecvssglang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| crowdsec | sglang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 15 358 | 38 315 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +411 | +1 933 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 76/100 for crowdsec, so it is the safer default.
sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for crowdsec.
If you want the quickest setup, crowdsec is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 933 stars in 30 days).
crowdsec details →sglang details →
Swap a project
Keep crowdsec, compare it with
Keep sglang, compare it with