# crowdsec vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | crowdsec | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 78 in Security | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 15 358 | 46 448 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +411 | +1 313 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.8.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 76/100 for crowdsec, so it is the safer default.

crowdsec ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [crowdsec](https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/crowdsec.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/crowdsec-vs-mitmproxy