# croodle vs OpenEMR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | croodle | OpenEMR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #1 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 214 | 5 555 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +89 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenEMR scores 72/100 against 41/100 for croodle, so it is the safer default.

OpenEMR ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for croodle.

If you want the quickest setup, croodle is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

OpenEMR is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [croodle](https://selfhost.directory/project/croodle) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/croodle.md)
- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/croodle-vs-openemr