# croc vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | croc | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 40 798 | 95 273 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +355 | +2 311 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 48 ✓ | 25 |
| Latest release | v11.5.5 · 19 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 82/100 for croc, so it is the safer default.

croc ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.

If you want the quickest setup, croc is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [croc](https://selfhost.directory/project/croc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/croc.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/croc-vs-stirling-pdf