# croc vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | croc | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 40 807 | 393 359 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +364 | +2 935 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 48 ✓ | 38 |
| Latest release | v11.5.5 · 19 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.9 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 82/100 for croc, so it is the safer default.

croc ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 38 for openclaw.

If you want the quickest setup, croc is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 935 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [croc](https://selfhost.directory/project/croc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/croc.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/croc-vs-openclaw