# croc vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | croc | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 40 801 | 93 418 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +358 | +58 144 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 48 ✓ | 35 |
| Latest release | v11.5.5 · 19 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 82/100 for croc, so it is the safer default.

croc ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.

If you want the quickest setup, croc is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 144 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [croc](https://selfhost.directory/project/croc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/croc.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/croc-vs-omnivoice-studio