# Crawl4AI vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted [Web Scraping projects](https://selfhost.directory/web-scraping), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Crawl4AI | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 16 in Web Scraping | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 86 457 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 287 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Crawl4AI scores 87/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Crawl4AI ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Crawl4AI needs more configuration.

Crawl4AI is growing faster right now (+2 287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Crawl4AI](https://selfhost.directory/project/crawl4ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/crawl4ai.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/crawl4ai-vs-url-to-png