# Crawl4AI vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Crawl4AI | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 16 in Web Scraping | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 86 520 ✓ | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 300 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Crawl4AI scores 86/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Crawl4AI.

If you want the quickest setup, Crawl4AI is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

Crawl4AI is growing faster right now (+2 300 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Crawl4AI](https://selfhost.directory/project/crawl4ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/crawl4ai.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/crawl4ai-vs-typetype