# Crawl4AI vs Tinystatus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Crawl4AI | Tinystatus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 16 in Web Scraping | #37 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 86 493 ✓ | 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 273 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Crawl4AI scores 86/100 against 45/100 for Tinystatus, so it is the safer default.

Crawl4AI ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tinystatus.

If you want the quickest setup, Tinystatus is easier to run; Crawl4AI needs more configuration.

Crawl4AI is growing faster right now (+2 273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Crawl4AI](https://selfhost.directory/project/crawl4ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/crawl4ai.md)
- [Tinystatus](https://selfhost.directory/project/tinystatus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tinystatus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/crawl4ai-vs-tinystatus