cozystackvsSparkyFitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cozystack | SparkyFitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 376 | 6 498 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 | +398 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 26 |
| Latest release | v1.6.4 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
cozystack scores 67/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for cozystack.
If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; cozystack needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+398 stars in 30 days).
cozystack details →SparkyFitness details →