cozystackvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cozystack | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 2 375 | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 28 |
| Latest release | v1.6.4 · 16 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 67/100 for cozystack, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for cozystack.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; cozystack needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).
cozystack details →SeaweedFS details →