# couchtube vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | couchtube | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #31 of 36 in Video Streaming | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 267 | 29 390 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 40/100 for couchtube, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for couchtube.

If you want the quickest setup, couchtube is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [couchtube](https://selfhost.directory/project/couchtube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/couchtube.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/couchtube-vs-srs