CouchDBvsPercona XtraDB Cluster
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CouchDB | Percona XtraDB Cluster | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 40 in Database Management | #27 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 6 993 | 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Erlang | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
CouchDB scores 70/100 against 58/100 for Percona XtraDB Cluster, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, CouchDB is easier to run; Percona XtraDB Cluster needs more configuration.
CouchDB is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).
CouchDB details →Percona XtraDB Cluster details →
Swap a project
Keep CouchDB, compare it with
Keep Percona XtraDB Cluster, compare it with