CoturnvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 14 530 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn scores 71/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Coturn needs more configuration.
Coturn details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with