CoturnvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 14 530 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn scores 71/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, Coturn is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Coturn is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with