# Coturn vs TwitchDropsMiner

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | TwitchDropsMiner |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #11 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 ✓ | 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v2.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Coturn scores 71/100 against 51/100 for TwitchDropsMiner, so it is the safer default.

TwitchDropsMiner ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.

Coturn is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [TwitchDropsMiner](https://selfhost.directory/project/twitchdropsminer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twitchdropsminer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-twitchdropsminer