# Coturn vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 | 47 724 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +97 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.

Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Coturn needs more configuration.

Coturn is growing faster right now (+97 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-text-generation-webui