CoturnvsTerraforming Mars
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | Terraforming Mars | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #4 of 14 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 526 | 961 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Coturn scores 71/100 against 62/100 for Terraforming Mars, so it is the safer default.
Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Terraforming Mars.
Coturn is growing faster right now (+99 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →Terraforming Mars details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep Terraforming Mars, compare it with