# Coturn vs sglang

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | sglang |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 14 529 | 38 338 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +1 930 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sglang scores 86/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.

sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.

If you want the quickest setup, Coturn is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.

sglang is growing faster right now (+1 930 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [sglang](https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-sglang