Coturnvssglang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coturn | sglang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 | 38 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +97 | +1 917 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 17 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.
sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.
If you want the quickest setup, Coturn is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 917 stars in 30 days).
Coturn details →sglang details →
Swap a project
Keep Coturn, compare it with
Keep sglang, compare it with