# Coturn vs Playerr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | Playerr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #17 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 ✓ | 180 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 ✓ | v0.4.8 · 3 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Coturn scores 71/100 against 45/100 for Playerr, so it is the safer default.

Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Playerr.

Coturn is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [Playerr](https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-playerr