# Coturn vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 | 15 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +97 ✓ | +43 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.

Coturn ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.

If you want the quickest setup, Coturn is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

Coturn is growing faster right now (+97 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-peertube