# Coturn vs Orca

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Coturn | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in WebRTC | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 529 | 109 348 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +99 | +9 441 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker/4.18.0-r0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 71/100 for Coturn, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Coturn.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; Coturn needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 441 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Coturn](https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/coturn.md)
- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/coturn-vs-orca